HP LaserJet Pro M404dn vs Kyocera ECOSYS P2040dw
Detailed Technical Comparison & Buying Guide
HP LaserJet Pro M404dn
Kyocera ECOSYS P2040dw HP LaserJet Pro M404dn
Kyocera ECOSYS P2040dw
| Feature | HP LaserJet Pro M404dn | Kyocera ECOSYS P2040dw |
|---|---|---|
| Print Technology | Monochrome Laser | Monochrome Laser |
| Colour Output | Black | Black |
| Print Resolution | 1200 x 1200 dpi | 1200 x 1200 dpi |
| Black Print Speed (PPM) | 40 ppm | 40 ppm |
| Colour Print Speed (PPM) | N/A | N/A |
| First Page Out Time | 6.3 sec | 6.4 sec |
| Auto Double-Sided | Yes | Yes |
| Input Paper Capacity | 350 Sheets | 350 Sheets |
| Output Tray Capacity | 150 Sheets | 250 Sheets |
| Supported Paper Sizes | A4, A5, B5 | A4, A5, A6, B5 |
| Paper Weight Support | 60-175 g/m2 | 60-220 g/m2 |
| Scanner Type | None | None |
| Scan Resolution | N/A | N/A |
| Auto Document Feeder | None | None |
| Copy Speed | No | No |
| Wi-Fi Connectivity | No | Yes |
| Ethernet Support | Yes | Yes |
| USB Connectivity | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Printing Support | Yes | Yes |
| Display Panel | N/A | N/A |
| Monthly Duty Cycle | N/A | N/A |
| Ink/Cartridge System | N/A | N/A |
| Borderless Printing | N/A | N/A |
| Width | N/A | N/A |
| Depth | N/A | N/A |
| Height | N/A | N/A |
| Machine Weight | N/A | N/A |
| Energy Efficiency | N/A | N/A |
| Noise Level (dB) | N/A | N/A |
| Processor Speed | N/A | N/A |
| Internal Memory | N/A | N/A |
| Cloud Print Support | N/A | N/A |
| Security Features | N/A | N/A |
| Compatible OS | N/A | N/A |
| Included in Box | N/A | N/A |
| Warranty Period | N/A | N/A |
| Recommended Use | N/A | N/A |
⚖️ Expert Verdict
This comparison highlights the fundamental choice between the eco-friendly Kyocera P2040dw and the high-performance HP M404dn. The HP M404dn offers faster 'first-page-out' times and a more responsive interface for managing office print tasks. However, the Kyocera ECOSYS P2040dw features a long-life drum that significantly reduces the amount of plastic waste and provides lower running costs over several years. Both machines support automatic duplexing and have high-capacity paper trays, but the HP's security features are more advanced for protecting sensitive data. While the HP is more compact, the Kyocera’s build quality is more 'industrial' and designed for high-volume duty cycles. Kyocera’s setup is more technical and better suited for IT professionals, whereas the HP is very user-friendly for non-technical users. If you prioritse data security and rapid document response, the HP is the better tool. But for a business looking for the lowest possible long-term overhead and a lower environmental impact, the Kyocera P2040dw is the clear winner. The Kyocera wins for its superior economy and sustainability.