PrintersMag UK

Anycubic Photon Mono M5s vs Qidi Tech X-Max 3

Technical comparison for 3D printers

Specifications Anycubic Photon Mono M5s Qidi Tech X-Max 3
Printing Technology LCD Resin (MSLA) FDM (CoreXY)
Build Volume (XYZ) 218 x 123 x 200 mm³ 325 x 325 x 315 mm³
Chassis Structure N/A N/A
Enclosure Material N/A N/A
Hotend Design N/A N/A
Extruder Gear Type N/A N/A
Nozzle Material N/A N/A
Max Nozzle Temp N/A 350 °C
Nozzle Diameter N/A N/A
Filament Diameter N/A N/A
Build Plate Surface N/A N/A
Max Bed Temp N/A N/A
Max Printing Speed 105 mm/hr (with High Speed Resin) 600 mm/s
Max Acceleration N/A N/A
Max Volumetric Flow N/A N/A
Cooling System N/A N/A
Air Filtration N/A Activated Carbon
Supported Materials N/A N/A
LiDAR Sensor N/A N/A
Chamber Camera N/A N/A
Filament Run-out Sensor N/A N/A
Power Loss Recovery N/A N/A
Physical Dimensions 460 x 270 x 290 mm³ N/A
Product Weight 8.9 kg 25 kg
Input Voltage N/A N/A
Peak Power Draw N/A N/A
Control Panel / Display 10.1-inch Monochrome LCD N/A
Connectivity Options Wi-Fi, USB Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB Drive
Internal Storage N/A N/A
Motion Controller CPU N/A N/A
Application Processor N/A N/A
AI Neural Processing N/A N/A
Recommended Slicer N/A N/A
Supported OS N/A N/A
Bed Leveling System Leveling-Free System N/A
Enclosure Type N/A N/A
Vibration Compensation N/A N/A
AI Monitoring Features Resin Detection & Failure Monitoring N/A
Multi-Material Support N/A N/A
Manufacturer Warranty 1 Year 1 Year
Box Contents Printer, Build Plate, Resin Vat, Scraper, Mask X-Max 3, Dry Box, 2 Nozzles, Tools
Brand Anycubic Qidi Tech
Check Anycubic Photon Mono M5s Specs Check Qidi Tech X-Max 3 Specs

Anycubic Photon Mono M5s Review

✅ Pros: Stunning 12K detail and zero manual leveling.

❌ Cons: Post-processing (washing/curing) is messy.

Qidi Tech X-Max 3 Review

✅ Pros: Industrial grade; chamber heating prevents warping.

❌ Cons: Very heavy and large desktop footprint.

⚖️

Expert Verdict

The Qidi X-Max 3 wins for industrial materials like Nylon-CF, while the Anycubic wins for miniatures. The Qidi is a monster of a machine, whereas the Anycubic is a specialist for detail. **The downside:** The Qidi is extremely heavy and consumes significant power. We really wish the Anycubic had a better heater for cold-weather printing. Choose the Qidi for engineering, or the Anycubic for high-detail sculptures.

More Comparisons